After all they've said about sex, why does the left think we should care about this?

When Bill Clinton was getting his chops busted for getting some head in the Oval Office and then lying about it, Democrats far and wide told us it was just sex, that was personal and hey, everybody lies about sex anyway. Maybe they were just projecting, but that was their story, and they stuck to it.

Now stories are coming out that President Donald Trump, back in the day, might've banged a Playboy Bunny or maybe stuffed his schlong into a porn star, both while married to someone else.

Who fucking cares. Both allegations are about events more than a decade ago and involve only marital infidelity. I'm old enough to remember when President William J. Clinton was getting his root chuffed in the Oval Office, while president, and lefties and the press (but I repeat myself) all defended him. All I have to say is this: Here's the Playboy bunny:

Here's the porn star:

And here's what Bill was getting head from in the Oval Office:

OK,, she's not hideous, but I have to believe the leader of the free world could do better, especially while he was actually leader of the free world. Trump was just a rich guy at the time he supposedly tapped the above referenced hot chicks. And have you seen Melania?

Seriously, if my president can't keep his dick in his pants, I would much rather it be years before he was president with hot chicks than while he is president with a chick who could skip a meal. And please don't make me post a picture of Hillary. Just sayin'.

Can't wait until this guy is the First Gentleman, right?

No, really.

And can you blame him? He's married to this:

Her orange outfit seems oddly appropriate. Is she too big to jail?

How do you know the picture is photoshopped?

Because Hillary and Bill Clinton are in the same room. Let's face it, that's happened probably five times since the Clintons left the White House in 2001. Naturally, the lamestream media isn't reporting this -- the British press is, because Prince Andrew also is involved -- so it is up to The National Enquirer to put this business before the American public. Hell, the New York Times is still trying to figure out how to explain why John Edwards dropped out of the presidential race in 2004 without mentioning that Edwards was banging a campaign follower (and had a child with her) -- a story The National Enquirer also broke. Anyway, you can read about the scandal and its potential impact on the 2016 presidential race here. In the meantime, enjoy this image:

I can just hear her: "Bill, could you for once use that finger to zip up your damn pants?" Seriously, the only surprising thing about Bill Clinton being involved in a sex scandal is that it took so long for one to surface. Reminds me of this oldy-but-goody when that Russian punk band got arrested for protesting against Putin:

Hat tip to Insty for the link to Ed Driscoll.